Oil spill west of Norilsk as seen by Sentinel-2

diesel on river Ambarnaya

The spill has happened from the white round containers grouped on the bottom of this large zoom of the river Ambarnaya flowing from the bottom left corner towards the lake on the top.

The precise diesel images are already nicely captured by ESA:

https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2020/06/Arctic_Circle_oil_spill

But here are images grabbed from CreoDias. First the still clean green tinted stretch close to the Pyasino lake outflow to the top of the image of this small river that opens up to two paths in this image from the 23rd May. There is still some lake ice on the small ponds around the river.

Clean Ambarnaya river
Clean Ambarnaya river

Next the stretch is visible on 31st May with diesel visible.

diesel on river Ambarnaya
diesel on river Ambarnaya

And finally the diesel has progressed further towards the lake on 1st June. The image is just from the border of the satellite swath.

Let’s hope the diesel can be stopped before entering the lake! If you want to investigate yourself, try this link to CreoDias browser. You can play around with different channels and make their weight change in the script.

UPDATE: Planet released a very clear looking image of the extent of the oil spilled. Many small water ponds south-east of the river that flows from the collapsed tank have red content clearly visible.

https://planet-pulse-assets-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2020/08/norilsk_20200604_106b_rgb_corrected_detail_1920_wm-1024×576.jpg

c Planet Labs Inc, 2020

Image was originally posted in this post: https://www.planet.com/pulse/clashing-eastern-superpowers-explosions-in-the-middle-east-dark-fishing-fleets-and-more/

Linking Remote Sensing and Local Observations with the Indigenous Knowledge Social Network

Siku App testing

Blog / Candice Pedersen & Sarah Rosengard / November 28, 2019

This fall has been a busy time for everyone in the Arctic Eider Society, as we have been preparing for the highly anticipated, official launch of the Indigenous Knowledge Social Network, SIKU.org, this December.

This platform started as a prototype back in 2015 as a joint initiative by community members of Sanikiluaq, Inukjuak, Umiujaq, Kuujjaraapik and Chisasibi. Today, it exists as a website and app for all Inuit communities to access cutting-edge weather, ice and ocean maps, and a safe space for sharing Inuit knowledge about ice, wildlife, travel safety and hunting. Any user can obtain weather forecasts and satellite imagery of ice conditions without having to find the individual web sources separately.

While people were already using Facebook to share hunting stories, these collaborators envisioned a social media platform that archived indigenous knowledge, but unlike a Facebook page, allowed all users to retain the rights to their knowledge. Since then, SIKU has grown into that very platform.

In particular, SIKU brings in Sentinel 1 Radar imagery, critical to assessing ice conditions during the dark winter months or through clouds, Sentinel 2 visual imagery, MODIS, and other imagery as well as derived products that dynamically process Sentinel 1 to assess ice roughness. Most importantly, reports about dangerous ice conditions by local hunters can be made with the app putting Inuit knowledge and observations front and center with weather and remote sensing products.

Created by Inuit for Inuit, SIKU.org continuously evolves as more communities adapt it for their own challenges, interests and priorities. As more people use the platform, it has become a great example of how Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit, science research, and technology can coalesce in one place to benefit communities through sharing of ice dangers and wildlife knowledge to younger generations.

The past three weeks, late October to mid-November, were an especially exciting time span for SIKU.org, as members of Arctic Eider Society traveled to eight communities from the Kitikmeot to Kivalliq regions of Nunavut to demonstrate the platform’s latest features to new users: from hunters to teachers, youth to elders, and college students to wildlife officers.

We are deeply thankful for the insights of each community member that joined us, and for their time spent sharing ways to make SIKU.org better for where they live. The lessons learned these past three weeks reflect the value of implementing SIKU.org in as many different places and seasons as possible. We are excited to turn everyone’s input from this fall into reality by incorporating ice conditions and wildlife names in all the different Inuktut dialects, and fine-tuning the app to better communicate travel dangers during seasons when ice conditions are most unstable.

Gjoa Haven workshop attendees after helping us lead a public community meeting about the app to their community

Gjoa Haven workshop attendees after helping us lead a public community meeting about the app to their community

After SIKU.org launches, we hope to continue growing our partnerships across the Inuit Nunangat, so that all communities may participate in SIKU.org’s ever-evolving development as a platform for self-determination and climate change resilience.

About the authors

Candice Pedersen

Candice Pedersen is a young Inuk who grew up in Iqaluit, Nunavut. A graduate of the Environmental Technology Program, Candice has been working in the enforcement field for the Government of Nunavut and most recently the Federal Government of Canada. Candice is the regional Kitikmeot coordinator for the Ikaarvik Program, which focuses on Inuit Qauyimayatuqangit (IQ) and the relationship between Inuit and researchers, and the Arctic Eider Society (AES), which runs the SIKU.org project. Candice first joined the SIKU.org development team after participating in a training workshop in March 2019, and represented AES at the United Nations Forum Convention on Climate Change in June. In her personal time, Candice is an avid outdoors person, enjoying hunting, camping, sewing garments for hunting and fashion alike, as well as protecting the environment. She has also been taught the traditional art of tattooing Inuit women and has been working to bring back these practices to the culture to empower aboriginal women in a rapidly changing modern world.

Sarah Rosengard

Sarah Rosengard grew up in Queens, New York. She is a SIKU coordinator for the Arctic Eider Society (AES) and a postdoctoral fellow in oceanography at the University of British Columbia (UBC). While completing a PhD in marine (and river) chemistry at MIT/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, she grew passionate about communicating science to stakeholders, using art to advance ocean science literacy, and helping communities drive the research process. Following these interests, she accepted a postdoctoral fellowship from the Ocean Leaders program at UBC to explore applications of ocean optics to marine resource management and STEAM education. Through this work, she connected with the AES and various partners in Nunavut to codevelop SIKU.org’s use across northern communities in close partnership with Candice.

This article first appeared on earthobservations.orgShare

Arctic seasonal weather outlook released

NovDecJan 19-20 seasonal temperature forecast

Every 6 months a new forecast and the verification of the past season will be analyzed.

In short: It seems that an even warmer Arctic winter is ahead of us.

The Arctic Regional Climate Forum (Arc-RCC) is made out of three centers: North America (USA, Canada), Eurasia (Russia) and the Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland).

Check out the Arctic seasonal forecasts report.

Read more at https://www.arctic-rcc.org/

Third Polar Data Forum concluded with advances in search and semantics

Third Polar Data Forum Group Photo

Helsinki hosted a wonderful Polar Data Forum. It was the third time ever and it had a new record audience at 150 participants in Forum sessions and over 30 extras in a closely related side-event. The first two days were packed with the conference having 36 presentations and 17 lightning talks. A great breadth of actions across the globe on three poles, technical for the most, but some even touching social matters. In conclusion we might say that in matters of data management remote areas of this world pay a lot of attention.

The next days two days 9 partly parallel sessions drilled practically into broad policy, detailed semantics and federated search topics. Sessions dedicated to data interoperability, Marine data, NASA Icesat2 mission and EU Polar data policy fleshed out progress and knowledge transfer in many directions. Attendance was in total about half of that of the conference, but most praise I heard afterwards came from this part.

Friday was then dedicated to business meetings of the Arctic Data Committee and the Standing Committee of Antarctic Data Management. They mixed at times to have actions well linked up. The ADC meeting sparked off a new direction for a potential new working group (currently Federated Search and Semantics): One for Analysis Ready Data from Earth Observation (=satellite data). Anyone is welcome to join, we especially hope anyone that is hosting Arctic EO data would join this group.

Thanks a bunch for everybody at Helsinki last week!

Arctic Observations Value trees reveal a weaker system for the Arctic than for the developed world

Ozone Sounding launch

SAON developed a framework for assessing arctic observing networks in 2017 and FMI lead a project to use this framework in a value tree for meteorological and oceanographic networks as one of the last efforts in the Finnish chairmanship of the Arctic Council. The results can be viewed on the http://arctic-obs.fmi.fi/ site.

It is good to recognize that efforts in these disciplines for networks between 30°N and 60°N are five times greater than for networks north of 60°N – it’s 810 m€ compared to 178 m€ per year. The table below describes the amount of stations in 30° latitude slices of our Earth according to the WMO Oscar database and related to area of Earth.

Latitude slicetotal WIGOSco-sponsorednon-affiliatedarea %land %
60°N-90°N 2 218 1 352 853 136,533,04
30°N-60°N13 0707 4365 47216218,378,79
0°N-30°N 8 0622 8205 222 2025,16,81
0°S-30°S 5 8052 3003 432 7325,15,66
30°S-60°N 4 120 9173 199 418,370,91
60°S-90°S 712 165 547 06,532,53

Comparing network densities between the most developed world in 30°N-60°N and the Arctic (>60°N), Arctic observing networks would need to be roughly doubled for the same level of information. Land-based networks a little less than monitoring over sea areas. The WMO global observing system WIGOS is largely land-based, while co-sponsored networks are mainly observing systems on the sea co-organized by WMO and IOC. Non-affiliated networks are stations from research organizations/universities.

Doubling the efforts for Arctic Observing networks seems pertinent for meteorology and oceanography. Other observing systems for biodiversity or pollution have not been analyzed, so also the expansion of the value tree exercise is necessary for a holistic view on Arctic Observing needs.

WMO OSCAR all stations plot with 30° latitude slice borders at 60°N, 30°N, 0°, 30°S, 60°S.

Hello world of Arctic enthusiasts!

Copernicus celebration in Baveno

Welcome to this new site dedicated to actions from Sustaining Arctic Observing Networks to Group on Earth Observation. We will in the coming years have stories how Earth Observation information can help life in the Arctic.

The stories will come from pilot services developed in the E-Shape project that showcases EuroGEOSS, the new regional initiative of GEO for Europe. However this site is looking for anyone to offer their stories of environmental monitoring of our dear planet helping to solve real life challenges to people and nature in the Arctic.

If you want to contribute, tell us at root@arcticgeoss.org and we will add your story to this blog. We are looking for stories with rich information services using a wealth of monitoring information, but the main beef is the concrete benefit of this information.

We’re excited to kick this off!